“What Will Be Our Legacy?“
David A. Palanzo, CCP
For the past fifteen years, it has been the honor and privilege of the President of the American Academy of Cardiovascular Perfusion to deliver the Thomas G. Wharton Memorial Lecture. The topics over the past fifteen years have been diverse but most have covered reflections on the past or problems confronting perfusion at that time.
Who was Thomas G. Wharton? Thomas Wharton wasn’ t a perfusionist but a friend of perfusion in the true sense of the word. He worked for Travenol Laboratories for sixteen years starting in 1958. Tom then started his own company, Human Resources, Inc. During this time he served as the first Executive Director of the Journal of Extracorporeal Technology, the Executive Director of the American Society of Extracorporeal Technology (1977) and the Executive Director of the American Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion. In 1978, Tom moved to California accepting the position of Product Manager of tubing packs for William Harvey Research Corporation.
Thomas Wharton believed in perfusion as a career and a profession. He also believed in formal education for the perfusionist. In the summer of 1979, Tom handed a perfusionist from Birmingham, Alabama, $2000.00 and told him to “go out and start that organization of professional perfusionists that we all need.” That is how this Academy was founded. Unfortunately while driving to work that fall, Tom had a heart attack and died. He never witnessed the formation or attended the first meeting of this society he was so instrumental in forming.
The title of my talk today is “What Will Be Our Legacy?” Legacy, as defined by Webster, is something handed down from one who has gone before or from the past.l Before we can predict or plan what we will leave for perfusionists in the future we need to examine the present and the past to see what we were left by our predecessors.
If you will indulge me, I would like to give you a brief review of our past as seen through the eyes of our past presidents. Have we learned from their experiences? Have we taken their advice and heeded their warnings?
I would also like to address some of the problems facing perfusion today. Their solutions will affect perfusion far into the twenty-first century.
Perfusion in the Past
Cardiovascular perfusion is a relatively young profession. Many of the early perfusionists were physicians. Some were surgical residents, anesthesiologists and even cardiac surgeons. As the field of cardiac surgery grew so did the need for pump technicians. Laboratory technicians, engineers, Navy corpsman or anyone with a keen interest and desire to become involved in this new and challenging field of endeavor were trained to operate the heart-lung machine.
“During this period, we perfusionists were privileged to work with heroes and that’s what the surgeons and anesthesiologists were, because of their courage to face new challenges without guidance or precedence, without sophisticated monitors or equipment and with only their intelligence and clinical accumen to contribute to the surgical outcome. Open heart surgery was encouraged by an extraordinary group of surgeons who had courage together with imagination, vision, skill and determination. This was a golden era. Almost every operation was a new experiment and every experiment was relevant. There were no animal models for the diseases treated, no alternative therapies and no human experimentation committees The diseases were essentially incurable, many with fairly predictable high mortality. The downside risk was small To try was better than to do nothing. And the perfusionists in the early days were heroes too. They had no teachers, save experience. They learned from empiricism. It was a day of glass and stainless steel.”2
Charles Reed, 1984
During the infancy of cardiac surgery, there were many remarkable successes. There were also many failures.
“The early practice of perfusion was an uncertain and not entirely predictable course of events.”3 Aaron Hill, 1986
But we learned from those failures and negative experiences and developed better equipment and techniques.
For a glimpse at the past history of cardiac surgery through the eyes of the perfusionist, I encourage you to read, “Perfusion Lessons from the Past” a short thirteen page presentation that Charlie Reed delivered at the Eighth Annual Seminar of the American Academy of Cardiovascular Perfusion in Toronto, Canada in 1988. Charlie’s closing comment notes repeating.
“If l have anything to say, I would urge you to go back and read the early literature, you will flnd, to your absolute amazement, that an astounding amount of work was done before 1965 that will answer most of the questions that we can pose today.”4 Charles Reed, 1988
By the early to mid 1970s we see the evolution of pump technicians into perfusionists. Perfusion was evolving into a profession. Formalized training programs were emerging and there was the formation of a national organization, the American Society of Extracorporeal Technology.
With the advent of coronary artery bypass grafting in the mid to late 1970s, many new open-heart surgery programs were established further increasing the need for trained perfusionists. The American Academy of Cardiovascular Perfusion was formed in 1980 out of a need for a national organization whose primary focus was perfusion education.
“The field of perfusion is such that the opportunities for a perfusionist ‘s input and study are nearly unlimited.
We no longer routinely prime with whole blood as we did in 1972 mortality has decreased significantly, but cardiopulmonary bypass is still not a benign procedure. While perfusion is no longer an experiment, it does remain a challenge and that challenge can be met through education.”5 Mark Kurusz , 1983
As a direct result of a perceived shortage of perfusionists, the mid to late 1980s witnessed a tremendous increase in the number of perfusion schools and the number of students being trained. New graduates were entering the field of perfusion in larger numbers than ever before. Questions were arising though as to the motivation of these new members to the perfusion profession.
“Perfusionists’ salaries have improved dramatically in the last fIve years, thus making perfusion a very attractive profession. Combine the attractive salaries with an ever-increasing number of perfusion schools and all of a sudden everybody wants to become a perfusionist. The ‘new breed’ expects a high salary, short hours, great benefits, and very little call. Most of the students entering the profession are purely money motivated, and the idea of being there for the patient first and foremost does not exist.”6 Dennis Williams, 1990
The concern for quality perfusion education was a primary concern for much of the late 1980s and continues until today. In his 1992 address, Terry Crane made several good points.
“The success of our careers has not been in doing something unique, but in mastering the technology of the time, and in having the courage and vision to carry it to its limits in a process that others would follow. This success has not been a sudden outburst of genius but it has been the result of continual, patient, commonplace work. Those of us willing to learn from the experience of others will escape a great deal of trouble, sorrow and regret. We must constantly remember that our mistakes will be failures if we do not learn from them. It seems so strange that a few of us are unwilling to profit from the experience of past perfusionists. There are many of us who prefer to learn by our own experience of disaster, but think that we might have known without its sorrow and cost. We have often read journals, bulletins, magazines, manuals, and textbooks written by experienced people, but many of us will rush headlong without a glance at the warnings they have left.
What could be a more fulfilling goal for us today than to make a significant difference in the life of another perfusionist and help them reach their full potential?”7 Terry Crane, 1992
The changing health-care system has had a major impact on all of us throughout the 1990s. As early as 1987, John Meserko was giving us insight into what was to come. John reminded us though that our primary responsibility is not just providing service but providing quality.
“I implore perfusionists today to go back to their individual teams and institution and rethink the concept of quality. We owe it to our patients to provide them with the best service in these somewhat uncertain times. If every support group that provided health care to individuals would rethink and re-quantify their quality issues then I believe that the uncertainty and the purported lack of quality issues could be done away with forever. The business of health care can certainly be weighted in dollars. The most ideal situation would be able to weight the business of health care in terms of quality. Then the business definition could become an altruistic definition. Quality is service. We are in the business of providing service.
We should be in the business of providing quality.”8 John Meserko, 1987
In more recent years, the focus of most of the Thomas G. Wharton memorial lectures have dealt with the perfusionist as an individual. His or her needs, stresses, responsibilities and goals are all touched upon throughout the addresses. James MacDonald, in 1993, reminded us of our responsibility to our patients in his address on professionalism.
“Being a perfusionist is much more than establishing the extracorporeal circuit of choice and conducting cardiopulmonary bypass. We must remind ourselves that the recipient of our specialized care, the patient, deserves special mention. We know that to be a clinical perfusionist is to belong to a quality control profession. For the well-being of our patients, we cannot make a mistake. When mistakes are made, it is just as devastating to the perfusionist as it might be to our patient. “9
James MacDonald, 1993
Jim also points out to us our responsibility not to compromise the patients under our care.
“If, as a perfusionist, your personal caring of the cardiac surgical patient does not receive a very high priority, you fail in the attempt to provide dedicated professional service, and the patient is compromised. Perfusionists who compromise patient care are not tolerated.”9 James MacDonald, 1993
As professionals, it is important that we strive to attain certain qualities and virtues.
“If we as educators fail to impact the intangible aspects of education, I fear that we as a profession will fail to thrive and survive, and will only become, once again, pump techs. We must remember that the past is always underfoot and we must tread very carefully toward the future. I can only hope that the Academy will continue to teach, by example, the sustaining principles of dignity and propriety which will lead perfusion very carefully into the future.”10 SueReaves, 1994
“We need to love ourselves enough to represent ourselves as professionals, not only to people we work with, but also our peers.”11 Jerry Richmond, 1995
We also need to maintain balance in our daily lives.
“I decided that I would address an issue that is the greatest struggle in my life and perhaps yours too. That is FINDING A BALANCE IN LIFE when your work is as demanding as ours is.”12 Richard Berryessa, 1997
It is extremely important for us as perfusionists to make the right choices.
“The American Academy of Cardiovascular Perfusion may continue to change, but I hope we will continue to make the correct choices. … difficult choices are better made in an environment of compassion, support, and wisdom than amidst adversity, deceit, and ignorance.”13 Diane Clark, 1996
There are several problems or issues that confront the field of perfusion today that will greatly impact its future. Too many perfusionists today, disenchanted with the changes health care has made on our practices see perfusion as a job not a career.
“Somewhere on the way to this new day, the dedication, pursuit of excellence, and sense of purpose appears to have been lost.”3 Aaron Hill, 1986
We need to regain the enthusiasm and interest in our profession that has been lost over the past several years.
Another area that has seen a decline is research. The number of manuscripts being published by perfusionists has been steadily decreasing. This could be due to several reasons. With the recent changes in the health-care system and reimbursement, monies allocated to research have been drastically slashed. Even though the number of publications has declined the overall quality and substance has increased. In some respects this is true but not totally. We need to spend the extra time to do research. I realize that not everyone can do controlled laboratory experiments or complex clinical studies, but we can still be involved. Collaborate with other centers who have the facilities and capabilities. Enlist the help of good authors who may not be as active clinically as they once were. There are plenty of interesting cases that can be reported. Literature reviews on special topic areas is another area that could be explored.
There are a large number of senior perfusion students’ research papers that go no further than the desk of the program director. Why? Submit them to the Student’s section of the Academy’s newsletter. Get the information out. Use the intenet. Do not be afraid to get patient consent or petition your institutional review board for an investigation of equipment or technique comparisons. We will become stagnant unless we strive to continually improve the way we conduct cardiopulmonary bypass.
We need to continue to develop national standards for perfusion. We need to reexamine how and why we do things the way that we do. Are our present acceptable standards founded in true clinically evaluated facts or just myths? We need to conduct the investigations to validate our techniques and practices.
A big issue today is job security. How do we protect our place within the hospital without fear of being replaced by a lower bid. One way is to get involved. Spend the extra time needed to be on the various committees that directly or even indirectly affect your existence. Join your hospital’s patient outcomes committee. Educate the members as to how perfusion, in particular what you do or do not do, can directly affect patient outcomes. Inform administration as to what perfusionists do and can do.
“Become active participants in public relations yourself. “14 Dr. Raymond Stofer, 1988
If you are an integral part of the decision-making affecting perfusion, what better way to maintain job security. We need to return to the days when the perfusionist was a key resource within the operating room and the hospital not just another employee.
Continue to educate yourself. Stay current. Read the literature. Communicate with other perfusionists about their research, their practices, how they handle quality assurance issues as well as many other areas.
Perfusion in the Future
What will the future bring? What will truly be our legacy? It is up to us. We were handed a rich heritage from those that came before us in perfusion. We need to follow their examples and guidance. We are in desperate need of strong leaders to steer the course ofthe perfusion profession well into the next century. We need to put our hearts back into our practices. I leave you today with some enlightening words that were spoken at this same forum sixteen years ago. Their meaning and guidance still ring true today.
“We are functioning in the constantly changing and challenging field of medicine. We each have a brain, the ability to use it and combined with the ability to observe, it is not unrealistic to imagine that anyone or all can leave something during that heartbeat of time. However, do not build for acknowledgement or reward in your time. If you need justification for your efforts then consider it fair payment for the privilege of being in the most challenging and exciting specialty in medicine during its most important period in recorded history.15 Charles Reed, 1982
I thank you for your patience and your attention.
1. Webster’s 11 New Riverside Desk Dictionary. Stamford, CT. Longmeadow Press, 1995: 241.
2. Reed CC. Perfusion reflections and perspectives. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1984; 5: 7-9.
3. Hill AG. Perfusion – a career? Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1986; 7. 8-10.
5. Kurusz M. A career in perfusion. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1983;4: 8-9.
6. Williams DR. Perfusion education: quality versus quantity. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1990; 11: 7-8.
7. Crane TN. Together in excellence and education. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1992; 13: 7-10.
8. Meserko JJ. The business of health care: Quality or Quantity? Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1987. 8: 1115.
9. MacDonald J. On a personal note … Proc Am Acad Cadiovasc Perfusion 1993; 14: 7-11.
lO. Reaves Sue. Reflections on the future. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1994; 15: 8-9.
11. Richmond JW. Love and perfusion. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1995; 16: 7-8.
12. Berryessa R. Life hangs in the balance. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1997;18:7-9.
13. Clark D. lf I do this, I cannot do that. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1996; 17. 7-8.
14. Stofer RC. The cause and cure for the shortage of perfusionists. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1988; 9.7-8.
15. Reed CC. The decline and fall of the perfusion empire: an editorial comment. Proc Am Acad Cardiovasc Perfusion 1982: 3: 7-9.